The replication is so important in science. Common choices that can affect the reliability of results by being made after the experiment has started include when to stop the experiment, how to analyse the data, and which subgroup comparisons to carry out. Finally, the researcher can draw conclusions about an experimental.
Suppose you tested the effectiveness of your new medicine by giving it to one person and their symptoms cleared up. That's because you know that not everyone will respond the same, that there is variation to be expected.
Therefore, you would test the new medicine on many, many people replicates. A well-replicated experiment ensures that the effect of one thing the independent variable on the other the dependent variable is real, true, reliable, valid. It accounts for the variation we expect to exist in nature. How science works page 17 of 21 previous next. Copycats in science: The role of replication. Similarly, two different researchers studying the same dinosaur bone in the same way should come to the same conclusions regarding its measurements and composition.
This goal of replicability makes sense. This prompted a reckoning : Common practices like drawing on small samples of college students were found to be insufficient to find true experimental effects. Scientists thought if you could find an effect in a small number of people, that effect must be robust. But often, significant results from small samples turn out to be statistical flukes.
For more on this, read our explainer on p-values. The crisis intensified in when a group of psychologists, which included Nosek, published a report in Science with evidence of an overarching problem: When psychologists tried to replicate experiments published in top journals, only around 40 percent of the studies held up.
The remainder either failed or yielded inconclusive data. And again, the replications that did work showed weaker effects than the original papers.
The studies that tended to replicate had more highly significant results compared to the ones that just barely crossed the threshold of significance. As part of the new study, Nosek and his colleagues added a prediction component.
The bets largely tracked with the final results. As you can see in the chart below, the yellow dots are the studies that did not replicate, and they were all unfavorably ranked by the prediction market survey.
One thing that stands out: Many of the papers that failed to replicate sound a little too good to be true. Take this paper that finds simply washing hands negates a common human hindsight bias.
When we make a tough choice, we often look back on the choice we passed on unfavorably and are biased to find reasons to justify our decision. All that said, there are some promising signs that social science is getting better.
More and more scientists are preregistering their study designs. This prevents them from cherry-picking results and analyses that are more favorable to their favored conclusions. Journals are getting better at demanding larger subject pools in experiments and are increasingly insisting that scientists share all the underlying data of their experiments for others to assess.
While some might be tempted to look at the results of such replication projects and assume that psychology is rubbish, many suggest that such findings actually help make psychology a stronger science. Human thought and behavior is a remarkably subtle and ever-changing subject to study, so variations are to be expected when observing diverse populations and participants.
Some research findings might be wrong, but digging deeper, pointing out the flaws, and designing better experiments helps strengthen the field. Ever wonder what your personality type means? Sign up to find out more in our Healthy Mind newsletter. Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur? Perspectives on Psychological Science. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
Kahneman D. A new etiquette for replication. Social Psychology. Your Privacy Rights. To change or withdraw your consent choices for VerywellMind. At any time, you can update your settings through the "EU Privacy" link at the bottom of any page. These choices will be signaled globally to our partners and will not affect browsing data.
We and our partners process data to: Actively scan device characteristics for identification.
0コメント