Modernism is about inclusiveness while traditionalism advocates limitation. Modernism is essential because it embraces change, growth and opportunities. For example, the young students in Florida that were victims of the mass shooting they were empowered to use their voice to speak to hate and advocate change. They were met by opposition but they did not succumb to political pundits who claimed that they were too young to speak out.
The students showed how not to allow political views stifle to change and progress. The clash today is that there is a traditionalist ideology trying to adapt to modernist society and there is modernist ideology trying to adapt to a traditionalist ideology.
Although there is a difference in ideas and culture beliefs each one can respect the other. So looking at back at all the movements today, they are established with the idea of creating unity, pride, respect, strength, knowledge, power, and change. Moreover, the new traditionalism humans are still capable of understanding the world.
Traditionalism promotes the value of tradition and well served by all when there is a contribution made to make progress in society. Although social change is a part of every society, the characteristics of modernism is associated with an open mind, freedom of choice, free thinking, innovation and justice Tomar, This process allows the world to evolve and offer opportunities for all. Whether you are on the side of traditionalism or modernism it is wise to understand the ideology of both.
It is okay to critique both of them in order to gather an analysis to understand the purpose of both of them. Both are derived from cultural beliefs, morals and values. They are also driven my political and religious views.
Social debate is good for growth and understanding the views of other. At one point traditionalism was the gold star standards and most people followed them. Today the traditionalist values exclude some people based on sexual orientation, race, religious affiliation etc. Modernism allows one to adapt to the change that occur in society through empowerment and courage. Traditionalist and modernist ideologies are developed from cultural beliefs and ideologies.
Traditionalism and Modernism. Accessed November 11, Make sure your essay is original or hire a writer to make it plagiarism-free. We will send an essay sample to you in 2 Hours. If you need help faster you can always use our custom writing service. Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert. Category: Culture. Pages : 6. Please wait. Copy to clipboard. Presentation on theme: "Traditionalists vs.
Modernists"— Presentation transcript:. Download ppt "Traditionalists vs. About project SlidePlayer Terms of Service. Feedback Privacy Policy Feedback. All rights reserved.
Human beings are largely creatures of habit, and cultures help form those habits even before the rational and critical capabilities of the brain begin to function. However, as human beings mature they begin to compare their inherited world with the world of their experience and, depending on the community they were raised in, some people might be better prepared for change than others.
Some groups encourage their members to transcend group consciousness, others do not. Change can be seen as exciting or threatening. In a society with a mature tradition, people rise to challenges and welcome constructive changes. The societies that do this the best adapt and continue, while those who do not are relegated to the dust bins of history.
Unfortunately, inability to transcend group consciousness can produce reactionary and revolutionary behaviors. There are those who are unable to transcend group identity and integrate change with tradition and promote the peaceful transformation of society.
Both traditionalists and modernists have proven capable of great violence, even genocide, violating human rights, and causing massive human suffering and death. From this perspective, the violent revolutions proposed by Communists and the violent fundamentalist attacks by Islamists are both childish reactions to the need for constructive change.
They both reflect the inability to transcend a limited consciousness. While one side is on the extreme political right and the other on the extreme political left, they both refuse to recognize the human rights and ultimate value of other.
The rise of Islamist extremism revealed by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria ISIS and the vitriolic polemics, murder, and rape associated with it begs such an analysis. Swazo suggests that this discernment needs to be employed by both people inside and outside of Islam, but that perhaps it is most necessary for Islam itself to come to grips with this extremist faith and practice.
It was also the first time that blacks were accepted for their talents and abilities. There were even whites who began adapting some black cultural movements, at this time this was. The period of the twentieth century, specifically the nineteen-twenties, was a historically significant event in history due to the dramatic changes politically and socially.
In this time period there was many altercations between two specific groups who had completely different outlooks on change.
Modernists, or people who tended to be in favor of new ideas, styles and social trends, embraced the idea of change during this time period whereas traditionalist, or people who are opposed to change, had deep respect for long held cultural and religious values that they believed should not be broken under any circumstances.
In , a trial was held that was known as the Scopes trial.
0コメント